E2B
E2B is a sandbox platform for running untrusted agent code. The live price table is on e2b.dev/pricing. The old page led with "1B+ sandboxes" and "94% of the Fortune 100".
Compare Modal if you want Python serverless plus GPUs on the same bill, rather than a sandbox-first microVM.
Key Features
- Firecracker isolation: Each sandbox is a microVM, not a shared container.
- Code interpreter SDK:
e2b-code-interpreter/@e2b/code-interpreterforrun_code. - Desktop / computer use: Homepage still lists desktop sandboxes for browser and OS agents.
- Storage meter: Pricing page bills storage at $0.05 / 1 GB / month beyond 10 GB.
- Enterprise extras: Same page lists custom limits, SOC 2, SSO, SLAs, and on-prem / air-gapped as enterprise, not as Hobby defaults.
Use Cases
- Coding agents that must exec model-written code outside the orchestrator.
- Computer-use agents that need a disposable desktop.
- Products that want a sandbox vendor, not a general GPU cloud.
Limitation: we did not re-verify "sub-200ms", "24-hour sessions", or "100 concurrent on Pro" on a live limits page. Do not treat those as current first-party caps. Isolation is microVM; it is not Modal's container story.
Pricing
e2b.dev/pricing on 2026-08-17:
| Plan | Price | What the page states |
|---|---|---|
| Hobby | $0 + usage | $100 in one-time credits. No concurrent-sandbox cap listed. Community support. |
| Pro | $150 / month + usage | Higher limits, dedicated Slack. |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom limits, SOC 2, SSO, SLAs, on-prem / air-gapped, 24/7 support. |
| Compute | Usage | $0.000014 / s per vCPU ($0.0504 / vCPU-hour). $0.0000045 / s per GiB ($0.0162 / GiB-hour). |
| Storage | Usage | $0.05 / 1 GB / month beyond 10 GB. |
Getting Started
- Read e2b.dev and create an API key.
pip install e2b-code-interpreterornpm i @e2b/code-interpreter.- Run a sandbox, then
run_code. - Add spend alerts before you put it under an agent loop.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is E2B open source?
The E2B GitHub org is public. The hosted cloud is paid usage on top.
Hobby vs Pro?
Hobby is $0 plus usage with $100 one-time credits. Pro is $150 / month plus the same compute meters.
Is this the same as Modal?
No. Modal is a general serverless/GPU platform with a sandbox API. E2B is sandbox-first microVMs.
Alternatives
- Modal: Python serverless and a public GPU price list.
- Cloudflare Computer: Edge isolates if you already run on Cloudflare.
- OpenAI Agents SDK: Agent runtime. Point its tools at E2B when you need exec.
Tips
- Price vCPU, memory, and storage as three meters. The $150 is not a compute cap.
- Do not paste old Fortune 100 or 1B-sandbox claims into a deck.
- Confirm session length and concurrency on the dashboard. They were not on the pricing table we used.
Conclusion
E2B is still the Firecracker sandbox you buy when the agent must exec code or drive a desktop. Start at e2b.dev/pricing, then decide whether you need Modal's GPUs instead.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Related Tools
Daytona
www.daytona.io
Daytona is now a closed-source sandbox cloud. GitHub is archived. Starter $20, Plus $200, Scale $500, plus compute after included credits.
Cloudflare Computer
github.com/cloudflare/computer
Preview MIT agent filesystem on Durable Objects. Not production. Pay Workers usage, not a $0 computer SKU.
Modal
modal.com
Python serverless compute with a Sandbox API for untrusted agent code, scale-to-zero, and per-second CPU/GPU billing.
Related Insights

Grok Bot and Hermes Bot: one person finally gets a think tank and a secretariat
Grok Bot now ships with Cursor Pro+. Hermes Bot runs on a VPS. They are not smarter chat boxes. The think tank advises, the secretariat executes, and you still make the call.

Anthropic Subagent: The Multi-Agent Architecture Revolution
Deep dive into Anthropic multi-agent architecture design. Learn how Subagents break through context window limitations, achieve 90% performance improvements, and real-world applications in Claude Code.
Stop Cramming AI Assistants into Chat Boxes: Clawdbot Picked the Wrong Battlefield
Clawdbot is convenient, but putting it inside Slack or Discord was the wrong design choice from day one. Chat tools are not for operating tasks, and AI isn't for chatting.