Qodo
Qodo (formerly CodiumAI) is an AI code-review and governance product. First-party pack copy lists $30 / month for 2,500 credits (about 18 reviews), $60 / month for 5,000, and $240 / month for 20,000. Enterprise is a custom plan for 30+ users, not a $40 seat. A 14-day trial is still mentioned on Qodo's own academy page.
Compare CodeRabbit if you wanted a per-user PR bot (Lite $12 / Pro $24 / Team $30 yearly), and GitHub Copilot if you wanted completions plus a cloud agent rather than a reviewer.
Key Features
- IDE plus Git: The compare table still lists Git and IDE integrations on Pro Team and Enterprise.
- Agentic PR review: Included on both paid rows. Treat "full cross-repo context" as a product claim, not an audited metric.
- Rules system: Listed with no limit on the public compare table.
- Enterprise extras: SSO / SAML, audit logs, BYOK, single-tenant or on-prem, and a dedicated CSM sit on Enterprise.
Use Cases
- Teams that want usage-priced review and will start on the $30 / 2,500-credit pack.
- Orgs already mixing Copilot or Cursor that want a second review layer on GitHub or GitLab.
- People comparing Qodo credit packs vs CodeRabbit seats.
Limitation: Review-count estimates (~18 / ~36 / ~143) come from Qodo blog copy, not an independent benchmark. Do not treat $30 as a per-user seat. We did not re-verify F1 scores or named customer logos.
Pricing
qodo.ai/pricing on 2026-08-17, with pack sizes from first-party blog copy the same week.
| Plan | Price | Notes from those pages |
|---|---|---|
| Trial | 14 days | Academy copy still says no credit card. |
| Pro Team | From $30 / month | $0.012 / credit, pooled. 2,500 / 5,000 / 20,000 credit packs. Switch packs anytime. |
| Enterprise | Custom | For 30+ users. SSO / SAML, BYOK, on-prem. |
If a leftover page says $30 / user / month, treat the live credit table as the source.
Getting Started
- Open qodo.ai/pricing and start the trial.
- Install the GitHub or GitLab app on one repo before you buy a pack.
- Run one real PR through the reviewer and count false positives against the ~18-reviews-per-2,500-credit claim.
- Confirm Enterprise only if you need SSO or a private deployment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it still CodiumAI?
The product name is Qodo. CodiumAI is the old brand.
Is Teams $30 per user?
Pro Team is pooled credits from $30 / month.
Same as CodeRabbit?
Both comment on PRs. Qodo sells credit packs plus an IDE / governance story. CodeRabbit's public table is per-user seats.
Alternatives
- CodeRabbit: Lite $12 / Pro $24 / Team $30 yearly.
- GitHub Copilot: Completions and a cloud agent inside GitHub.
- Cursor: AI IDE; Bugbot is a separate add-on.
Tips
- Quote $0.012 / credit and the $30 / $60 / $240 packs together.
- Do not paste "highest F1" or customer logos into a deck.
- Confirm git-host coverage on your plan before you assume GitHub and GitLab are equal.
Conclusion
Qodo is credit-priced PR review, not a $30 / $40 seat SKU and not an unmetered "highest F1" slogan. Start at qodo.ai/pricing, then decide whether CodeRabbit already covers the review you need.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Related Tools
Augment Code
www.augmentcode.com
Enterprise coding agents. Enterprise custom. Not Indie $20.
Bito
bito.ai
AI PR review plus Architect. Team $12 yearly or $15 monthly; Professional $20 yearly or $25 monthly. 5K lines per seat.
CodeRabbit
www.coderabbit.ai
AI pull-request review on GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket. Lite $12, Pro $24, Team $30 per user, billed yearly.
Related Insights
Seven AI Coding CLIs, Six Months: No Matter How Strong the Model, Work Needs Supervision
Claude Code, Codex, opencode, pi, omp and DeepSeek Harness all have personalities. After six months of deep use I run a division of labor: pi for the fastest cheapest reviews, omp for complex PRs, DeepSeek Harness on V4 Flash for high-frequency low-cost review, and Claude Code, Qoder and Cursor for writing. No matter how strong the model, work needs supervision — ideally from an independent third party.
Skills + Hooks + Plugins: How Anthropic Redefined AI Coding Tool Extensibility
An in-depth analysis of Claude Code's trinity architecture of Skills, Hooks, and Plugins. Explore why this design is more advanced than GitHub Copilot and Cursor, and how it redefines AI coding tool extensibility through open standards.
Stop Cramming AI Assistants into Chat Boxes: Clawdbot Picked the Wrong Battlefield
Clawdbot is convenient, but putting it inside Slack or Discord was the wrong design choice from day one. Chat tools are not for operating tasks, and AI isn't for chatting.