Scientific Peer Review
Systematic process for evaluating scientific manuscripts with constructive, rigorous evaluation.
When to Use
- Conducting peer review of manuscripts for journals
- Evaluating grant proposals and research applications
- Assessing methodology and experimental design rigor
- Reviewing statistical analyses and reporting standards
- Evaluating reproducibility and data availability
- Checking compliance with reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA)
- Providing constructive feedback
Key Evaluation Areas
- Methodology: Experimental design, sample size, controls
- Statistics: Appropriate tests, power analysis, effect sizes
- Reproducibility: Data availability, code sharing, protocols
- Ethics: IRB approval, informed consent, conflicts of interest
- Reporting Standards: CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA compliance
Related Resource
The venue-templates skill provides reviewer expectations for different venues (Nature/Science, Cell Press, medical journals, ML conferences).
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Related Tools
Scientific Critical Thinking Skill
github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Evaluate research rigor systematically - assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, and evidence quality using GRADE and Cochrane ROB.
Scientific Writing Skill
github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Core skill for writing research manuscripts in IMRAD structure with proper citations, figures, and reporting guidelines.
Literature Review Skill
github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Conduct comprehensive systematic literature reviews across multiple academic databases with verified citations.
Related Insights
Skills + Hooks + Plugins: How Anthropic Redefined AI Coding Tool Extensibility
An in-depth analysis of Claude Code's trinity architecture of Skills, Hooks, and Plugins. Explore why this design is more advanced than GitHub Copilot and Cursor, and how it redefines AI coding tool extensibility through open standards.
Complete Guide to Claude Skills - 10 Essential Skills Explained
Deep dive into Claude Skills extension mechanism, detailed introduction to ten core skills and Obsidian integration to help you build an efficient AI workflow
Seven AI Coding CLIs, Six Months: No Matter How Strong the Model, Work Needs Supervision
Claude Code, Codex, opencode, pi, omp and DeepSeek Harness all have personalities. After six months of deep use I run a division of labor: pi for the fastest cheapest reviews, omp for complex PRs, DeepSeek Harness on V4 Flash for high-frequency low-cost review, and Claude Code, Qoder and Cursor for writing. No matter how strong the model, work needs supervision — ideally from an independent third party.