Scientific Critical Thinking
Systematic process for evaluating scientific rigor through methodology assessment, experimental design review, statistical validity analysis, bias detection, and evidence quality evaluation using GRADE and Cochrane frameworks.
Key Benefits
- Systematic evaluation of research methodology and rigor
- Bias detection across cognitive, selection, measurement, and analysis domains
- Statistical analysis validation and pitfall identification
- Evidence quality assessment with GRADE considerations
- Logical fallacy identification in scientific arguments
- Research design guidance for planning rigorous studies
- Claim evaluation for validity and support
Core Capabilities
- Methodology Critique: Study design assessment, validity analysis (internal/external/construct/statistical), control and blinding, measurement quality
- Bias Detection: Cognitive biases, selection biases, measurement biases, analysis biases, confounding identification
- Statistical Evaluation: Sample size/power, test appropriateness, multiple comparisons, p-value interpretation, effect sizes/CI, missing data, regression modeling
- Evidence Assessment: Study design hierarchy, quality within design type, GRADE framework, evidence convergence, contextual factors
- Fallacy Identification: Causation fallacies, generalization fallacies, authority/source fallacies, statistical fallacies, structural fallacies
- Design Guidance: Question refinement, design selection, bias minimization, sample planning, measurement strategy, analysis planning, transparency
When to Use
- Evaluating research methodology and experimental design
- Assessing statistical validity and evidence quality
- Identifying biases and confounding in studies
- Reviewing scientific claims and conclusions
- Conducting systematic reviews or meta-analyses
- Applying GRADE or Cochrane risk of bias assessments
- Providing critical analysis of research papers
- Planning new research studies
Includes comprehensive reference materials: scientificmethod.md, commonbiases.md, statisticalpitfalls.md, evidencehierarchy.md, logicalfallacies.md, experimentaldesign.md
Source: https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer/tree/main/skills/scientific-critical-thinking License: MIT
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Related Tools
Peer Review Skill
github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Systematic peer review toolkit for evaluating methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, and ethics.
Scholar Evaluation Skill
github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Apply ScholarEval framework to systematically evaluate scholarly work - comprehensive analysis across research quality dimensions with structured scoring and feedback.
Scientific Slides Skill
github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Build AI-generated PDF presentation slides for research talks using Nano Banana Pro - visually engaging and research-backed.
Related Insights
Skills + Hooks + Plugins: How Anthropic Redefined AI Coding Tool Extensibility
An in-depth analysis of Claude Code's trinity architecture of Skills, Hooks, and Plugins. Explore why this design is more advanced than GitHub Copilot and Cursor, and how it redefines AI coding tool extensibility through open standards.
Complete Guide to Claude Skills - 10 Essential Skills Explained
Deep dive into Claude Skills extension mechanism, detailed introduction to ten core skills and Obsidian integration to help you build an efficient AI workflow
Claude Code's Next Frontier: Not Code, But Your Local Obsidian Knowledge Base
Explore how Obsidian + Claude Code transforms from a knowledge management tool into your private AI assistant. Complete guide including obsidian-skills, Claudian plugin, Claudesidian template, and best practices for achieving both data privacy and AI capabilities.