Lovable
Lovable (formerly GPT Engineer) is a chat-to-app builder. The lowest paid Pro row is $25 / month for 100 monthly credits, or $250 / year. The lowest Business row is $50 / month for 100 monthly credits, or $500 / year. Higher Pro/Business tiers buy more credits (200, 400, 800, and up). Credits and usage still gives Free 5 daily build credits, capped at 30 / calendar month, plus a monthly Cloud grant and a monthly AI grant. Plan mode is 1 credit per message. This is not the old Free 20 generations / Pro $20 unlimited GPT-4 / Team $50 table.
Compare v0 if you wanted Vercel's UI generator, Bolt if you wanted another in-browser app builder, and Cursor if you wanted an IDE instead of a chat-to-app canvas.
Key Features
- Chat to a running app: Describe the product; Lovable edits the project and shows a preview. Treat the live editor as the catalog.
- Credit meter: Messages, builds, Cloud, and AI grants all land in credits. Free daily credits stop at 30 / month.
- Exportable code: Docs still say you own the project. Confirm current export and GitHub sync in-app before you assume zero lock-in.
- Workspace controls: Business adds team features and a higher credit price. There is no public Team $50 row.
Use Cases
- Founders who will pay $25 to chat an MVP into a preview.
- Teams that need Business $50 for workspace-private projects and higher credit packs.
- People comparing Lovable vs v0 vs Bolt on public credit tables, not on "unlimited GPT-4."
Limitation: Credits scale with prompt length and task complexity. "80-90% cheaper than hiring" and named reviewer quotes are not first-party facts listed here. Native iOS/Android generation is still not the product.
Pricing
docs.lovable.dev/introduction/subscription-plans on 2026-08-17. Entry rows first.
| Plan | Price | Notes from that page |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 5 daily build credits, 30 / month cap. Monthly Cloud grant 20 credits. Monthly AI grant 4 credits. |
| Pro | from $25 / month or $250 / year | 100 monthly credits at the entry row. Higher rows: $50 / $100 / $200 and up for more credits. |
| Business | from $50 / month or $500 / year | 100 monthly credits at the entry row. Higher rows start at $100 / month. |
| Top-ups | Pro $15 / 50 credits; Business $30 / 50 credits | From the credits page. Unused subscription credits expire on a documented schedule. |
If a leftover blog still lists unlimited $20 Pro or Team $50, treat the subscription-plans tables as the source.
Getting Started
- Open the subscription plans page and start on Free only long enough to hit the 30-credit monthly cap.
- Sign up at lovable.dev and describe one small app before you buy Pro $25.
- Confirm credits and usage before you assume Plan mode is free.
- Compare v0 or Bolt if you already pay for another generator.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Pro still $20 unlimited?
No. The live entry Pro row is $25 / month for 100 credits, or $250 / year.
Is there a Team $50 plan?
The paid families are Pro and Business.
Same as Cursor?
No. Lovable is a hosted chat-to-app builder. Cursor is an AI IDE you already write code in.
Alternatives
- v0: Better if you want Vercel-native UI generation.
- Bolt: Another in-browser builder if Lovable's credit math is the issue.
- Cursor: Better if you want to keep an editor.
Tips
- Quote Pro from $25 / month (100 credits) and Business from $50 / month.
- Do not paste "unlimited AI generations" into a deck.
- Confirm daily vs monthly credit grants before a demo week.
Conclusion
Lovable is a credit-metered chat-to-app builder, not an unmetered $20 GPT-4 seat. Start at the subscription plans page, then decide whether v0 or Bolt already covers the prototype you need.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Related Tools
Related Insights
Skills + Hooks + Plugins: How Anthropic Redefined AI Coding Tool Extensibility
An in-depth analysis of Claude Code's trinity architecture of Skills, Hooks, and Plugins. Explore why this design is more advanced than GitHub Copilot and Cursor, and how it redefines AI coding tool extensibility through open standards.
Stop Cramming AI Assistants into Chat Boxes: Clawdbot Picked the Wrong Battlefield
Clawdbot is convenient, but putting it inside Slack or Discord was the wrong design choice from day one. Chat tools are not for operating tasks, and AI isn't for chatting.
The Twilight of Low-Code Platforms: Why Claude Agent SDK Will Make Dify History
A deep dive from first principles of large language models on why Claude Agent SDK will replace Dify. Exploring why describing processes in natural language is more aligned with human primitive behavior patterns, and why this is the inevitable choice in the AI era.