Humanizer is a loadable agent skill that rewrites AI-sounding text so it reads like a person wrote it, without changing the claims. The repo blader/humanizer is MIT, created 2026-01-18. On 2026-09-06 GitHub listed about 43,874 stars and 3,670 forks. Homepage on the repo is skills.sh/blader/humanizer. r/PromptEngineering was discussing Wikipedia's Signs of AI Writing checklist skills this week; Humanizer is the high-star implementation of that guide, not a YouMind marketplace Skill.
Compare Claude Skills if you wanted how SKILL.md loads, Writing Skills if you wanted a meta-skill for writing skills themselves, or Scientific Writing if the draft is a paper.
Key Features
- 35 Wikipedia-derived patterns: README maps inflated importance, stock vocabulary, "not X but Y", em dash overuse, chatbot leftovers, filler, and more to before/after examples. Source: Wikipedia: Signs of AI writing.
- Facts stay put: Names, numbers, dates, quotes, and citations must come from the source or the writer. The skill is not allowed to invent them.
- Voice matching: Paste 2-3 paragraphs of your own writing and Humanizer follows that sample instead of its default style rules.
- File-aware: Point it at a Markdown file and it rewrites prose only, leaving code, data, frontmatter, and link targets alone.
- Cross-agent install:
npx skills add blader/humanizer --global, Claude Code plugin marketplace, or copySKILL.mdinto the agent's skill folder. Version 2.11.2 on the README.
Limitation: English-first. Several checks, especially dash frequency, do not map cleanly onto other languages. A zero-dash, zero-contrast rewrite can still read fake.
Use Cases
- People shipping blog posts, docs, or social copy who can see the AI tells and want a silent self-edit pass.
- Claude Code / Codex / Cursor users who already load skills and want
/humanizeron a file. - Editors who need the agent to show the first rewrite and a short critique before the final version.
Pricing
GitHub on 2026-09-06.
| Piece | Price | Notes from first-party pages |
|---|---|---|
| humanizer | $0 | MIT. About 43,874 stars. |
| Host agent | Confirm that product | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, or any skill loader. |
A smaller MIT checklist in the same Wikipedia lineage is Avinashricky211/writ (about 20 stars the same day). Treat Humanizer as the catalog pick.
Getting Started
- Open github.com/blader/humanizer and read
SKILL.md. - Install with
npx skills add blader/humanizer --global, or copy the skill into your agent folder. - Run
/humanizeron pasted text, or ask it to humanize a file path. - Confirm Claude Skills if you still need the loader docs.
First-party resource: Humanizer README.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does it detect AI, or rewrite it?
Rewrite. It is a self-edit checklist, not an AI-detector score.
Will it fabricate travel dates or quotes?
README says no. Missing details should be asked for, not invented.
Same as YouMind Skills?
No. This is a SKILL.md for coding agents. YouMind Skills live inside YouMind.
Alternatives
- Claude Skills: How skills load in Claude Code.
- Writing Skills: Meta-skill for writing other skills.
- Scientific Writing: Academic register, not AI-tell cleanup.
Tips
- Quote 43,874 stars, MIT, and 35 patterns from the README checked 2026-09-06.
- Give a writing sample if you care about voice.
- Do not treat a clean Humanizer pass as proof the text was never AI-assisted.
Conclusion
Humanizer is a 43k-star MIT skill that applies Wikipedia's AI-writing tells as a rewrite checklist. Start at github.com/blader/humanizer, then decide whether Claude Skills already covers how you load skills.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Related Tools
Related Insights

Anthropic Subagent: The Multi-Agent Architecture Revolution
Deep dive into Anthropic multi-agent architecture design. Learn how Subagents break through context window limitations, achieve 90% performance improvements, and real-world applications in Claude Code.
Seven AI Coding CLIs, Six Months: No Matter How Strong the Model, Work Needs Supervision
Claude Code, Codex, opencode, pi, omp and DeepSeek Harness all have personalities. After six months of deep use I run a division of labor: pi for the fastest cheapest reviews, omp for complex PRs, DeepSeek Harness on V4 Flash for high-frequency low-cost review, and Claude Code, Qoder and Cursor for writing. No matter how strong the model, work needs supervision — ideally from an independent third party.
Skills + Hooks + Plugins: How Anthropic Redefined AI Coding Tool Extensibility
An in-depth analysis of Claude Code's trinity architecture of Skills, Hooks, and Plugins. Explore why this design is more advanced than GitHub Copilot and Cursor, and how it redefines AI coding tool extensibility through open standards.