Literature Review
Conduct systematic, comprehensive literature reviews following rigorous academic methodology.
Overview
Search multiple literature databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar), synthesize findings thematically, verify citations, and generate professional documents.
When to Use
- Systematic literature reviews for research or publication
- Meta-analysis or scoping reviews
- Writing literature review sections
- State of the art investigations
- Research gap identification
Key Features
- Multiple Databases: PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar
- Citation Verification: Ensure accuracy across sources
- Professional Formatting: Markdown and PDF outputs
- Citation Styles: APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.
Mandatory Visual Enhancement
Every literature review MUST include 1-2 AI-generated figures using scientific-schematics skill.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Related Tools
Research Lookup Skill
github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Real-time research lookup using Perplexity Sonar models - access current academic literature with citations.
Peer Review Skill
github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Systematic peer review toolkit for evaluating methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, and ethics.
Scholar Evaluation Skill
github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Apply ScholarEval framework to systematically evaluate scholarly work - comprehensive analysis across research quality dimensions with structured scoring and feedback.
Related Insights
Skills + Hooks + Plugins: How Anthropic Redefined AI Coding Tool Extensibility
An in-depth analysis of Claude Code's trinity architecture of Skills, Hooks, and Plugins. Explore why this design is more advanced than GitHub Copilot and Cursor, and how it redefines AI coding tool extensibility through open standards.
Complete Guide to Claude Skills - 10 Essential Skills Explained
Deep dive into Claude Skills extension mechanism, detailed introduction to ten core skills and Obsidian integration to help you build an efficient AI workflow
Six AI Coding CLIs, Six Months: No Matter How Strong the Model, Work Needs Supervision
Claude Code, Codex, opencode, pi, omp and DeepSeek Harness all have personalities. After six months of deep use I run a division of labor: pi for the fastest cheapest reviews, omp for complex PRs, DeepSeek Harness on V4 Flash for high-frequency low-cost review, and Claude Code, Qoder and Cursor for writing. No matter how strong the model, work needs supervision — ideally from an independent third party.